EU 261 & 2026 Regulation overview

EU 261 new rules 2026: what changes with the reform of Regulation 261/2004

The EU air passenger rights regulation is being revised. The reform of Regulation 261/2004 was adopted in July 2026 — what changes in delay thresholds, definitions and the claim process, and what applies to a flight disrupted today. A dated, sourced breakdown. Reviewed May 2026.

Content updated:

Check your rights

Are you entitled to compensation?

If all 5 conditions below are met, it is very likely that you are entitled to compensation under EU Regulation 261/2004.

  • The flight departed from an airport within the EU, or landed in the EU and was operated by an EU-based airline.
  • The delay at the final destination was 3 hours or more — or the flight was cancelled or you were denied boarding.
  • You had a confirmed booking and checked in on time.
  • The airline did not give notice of the cancellation at least 14 days in advance.
  • The cause was not a genuine extraordinary circumstance (documented extreme weather, air-traffic-control strike and the like).
Start your claim →
Reading room of a law library — EU 261 new rules 2026: what changes with Regulation 2026/261

Regulation 261/2004 and the 2026 reform

Skärps
0
Luckras upp
0
Oförändrad
2
Ny regel
4
  1. Long-delay threshold for compensation on arrival

    Oförändrad

    EU 261/2004 Three hours under the CJEU's Sturgeon ruling (C-402/07 & C-432/07) — not written into the regulation text.

    2026 reform Unchanged: three hours.

    Källa: Conciliation Committee joint text, 15.06.2026
  2. Compensation amounts by flight distance

    Oförändrad

    EU 261/2004 €250 (≤1,500 km) · €400 (1,500–3,500 km / intra-EU >1,500 km) · €600 (>3,500 km outside EU)

    2026 reform Unchanged: €250 / €400 / €600.

    Källa: Conciliation Committee joint text, 15.06.2026
  3. Airline reply to a compensation claim

    Ny regel

    EU 261/2004 Not regulated in Regulation 261/2004.

    2026 reform New rule: the airline must reply to the claim within 30 days.

    Källa: Conciliation Committee joint text, 15.06.2026
  4. Small personal item in the cabin

    Ny regel

    EU 261/2004 Not regulated in Regulation 261/2004.

    2026 reform New rule: one small personal item in the cabin free of charge.

    Källa: Conciliation Committee joint text, 15.06.2026
  5. No-show clauses

    Ny regel

    EU 261/2004 Not regulated in Regulation 261/2004.

    2026 reform New rule: no-show clauses are banned.

    Källa: Conciliation Committee joint text, 15.06.2026
  6. Children under 14

    Ny regel

    EU 261/2004 Not regulated in Regulation 261/2004.

    2026 reform New rule: a seat next to an adult free of charge.

    Källa: Conciliation Committee joint text, 15.06.2026
Original visualisation

How the regulation actually got built — CJEU case-law timeline

Eight milestones that shaped EU 261/2004 from its 2004 enactment to the 2026 reform. Each case-id links to the published judgment on curia.europa.eu.

How the regulation actually got built — CJEU case-law timeline Eight milestones that shaped EU 261/2004 from its 2004 enactment to the 2026 reform. Each case-id links to the published judgment on curia.europa.eu. 2004 EU 261/2004 The regulation enters into force Flat-rate compensation €250 / €400 / €600 + care duty + right to refund. 2008 C-549/07 Wallentin-Hermann Routine technical faults are not an extraordinary circumstance. 2009 C-402/07 Sturgeon ruling 3-hour arrival delay treated as cancellation — full flat-rate compensation. 2013 C-11/11 Folkerts Compensation measured at final destination arrival — connecting flights count as one journey. 2013 C-139/11 Cuadrench Moré Limitation period follows national law — 10 years in Sweden. 2017 C-315/15 Pesková Bird strike counts as extraordinary — if the airline took reasonable measures. 2018 C-195/17 Krüsemann A wildcat strike by an airline's own cabin crew is NOT extraordinary. 2026 Reform 261/2004 The June 2026 agreement The 3-hour threshold and the €250/€400/€600 amounts are kept. The airline answers a claim within 30 days.
Source: curia.europa.eu published judgments + EUR-Lex CELEX entries. Compiled by Kravflyg editorial team.

“EU 261 new rules 2026” refers to the reform of Regulation 261/2004 (agreed in June 2026, adopted in July 2026). The reform does not touch the amounts: €250, €400 and €600 (roughly SEK 2,800, 4,500 and 6,800) stay. What it does is rewrite several core terms, clarify where the delay thresholds sit and tighten the requirements on how an airline must handle a compensation claim. The new rules start to apply about a year after publication in the Official Journal, so not before 2027. This page goes through what changes, what stays — and, just as important, what is still uncertain.

We will say it plainly right here: the reform was adopted in July 2026, but the new rules start to apply in 2027 at the earliest. Where the reporting diverges, we say so, cite the conflicting sources and stop short of presenting a contested figure as decided. That is the whole point of an honest breakdown of a rule still in motion.

One thing first: this is the air rules, not the rail rules

The EU is revising passenger rights across several areas at once, and that creates mix-ups. This page is about the air-travel reform — the reform of Regulation 261/2004. It is not about the EU's rules for rail passenger rights. If you search for “new passenger rights directive” or “new passenger rules 2026” you can land in the rail rules, which have entirely different amounts and conditions. If it is your delayed flight you are wondering about, you are in the right place.

EU 261/2004 applies today; the reform of Regulation 261/2004 was adopted in July 2026 and starts to apply in 2027 at the earliest.

Illustration of two regulations — an older one fading out and a newer one — with a forward arrow between them, EU 261/2004 and its reform

EU 261/2004 and the reform: what applies now and what is coming

Two sets of rules to keep apart: 261/2004 applies today, and the reform adopted in July 2026 starts to apply in 2027 at the earliest. The decisive point is that which set governs a claim is fixed by the date of the disruption, not by when the claim is filed:

  • EU 261/2004 — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — is the regulation that applies today. The whole breakdown of passenger rights in EU 261 is built on that text.
  • The reform of Regulation 261/2004 was adopted in July 2026. The new rules start to apply about a year after publication in the Official Journal, so not before 2027.

The decisive point for you as a passenger: which set of rules governs a claim is decided by the date of the flight disruption, not by when you file the claim. If your flight is delayed today, it is judged against 261/2004 even if you submit the claim much later. The reform does not change history — it applies going forward.

Why is the regulation being revised?

EU 261/2004 has applied for over two decades, and in that time a large part of what actually decides cases has grown up outside the text of the law itself. The 3-hour rule, how connecting flights are assessed, what counts as an extraordinary circumstance — these have largely been shaped by the Court of Justice of the EU, case by case. The result is a regulation that works but is hard to read: to know what applies you have to know both the regulation and a string of court rulings.

That creates two problems. Airlines can stretch the parts that rest only on case law, because a ruling can always be argued away as different from the case at hand. And passengers struggle to know their rights without digging into the law. The reform of Regulation 261/2004 is an attempt to fix both: to pull what is scattered today into a clearer, more complete regulatory text. That is why the reform strengthens the passenger’s position in substance even where it does not change a single figure — a rule in the text of the law is simply harder to get around than a reference to a court ruling.

What changes: an overview

The reform touches three areas, and the table below shows all of them at once. Not a single row reduces your rights: the stated purpose is to move principles that currently exist only in the Court’s case law into the text of the law itself, which makes them harder to argue away:

Area

EU 261/2004 (applies now)

The reform (adopted in July 2026)

Compensation amounts

€250 / €400 / €600

Unchanged in the texts published so far

Delay threshold

3 hours — established through EU case law, not the text of the law

The threshold is written into the regulatory text; three hours remains

Connecting flights

A single journey is assessed as a whole — via case law

The principle is written into the text

Extraordinary circumstances

A vague term, no exhaustive definition in the law

Clarified; cost reasons such as higher fuel prices are not to count as force majeure

Claim process

Few explicit response deadlines on the airline

The airline must answer a claim within 30 days

Duty of care

Meals, drinks, a hotel for a longer disruption

Stays; clarified

As you can see, not one row is a reduction of your rights. The reform’s stated purpose is to move principles that today exist only in court case law into the text of the law itself — which makes them harder for an airline to contest.

The delay threshold: three hours remains

This was the most disputed point in the reform. Under 261/2004 the 3-hour rule rests on the Court of Justice’s ruling in the joined Sturgeon cases (C-402/07 and C-432/07) — not on an explicit article. That has been a weakness: a rule built on case law is easier to question than a rule written in black and white in the regulation.

The reform wants to write the threshold straight into the text of the law. That is an improvement in substance. But where the threshold would land was long unclear. The Council of the EU position from June 2025 wanted to raise the threshold for shorter flights — four hours instead of three was discussed. Later Swedish reporting points the other way: Transportföretagen (the Confederation of Swedish Transport Enterprises) wrote in January 2026 that compensation “continues to be paid already after a three-hour delay regardless of the length of the flight”. The text adopted in July 2026 keeps three hours.

We have gathered what we know about this on a dedicated page — see the delay threshold after the reform.

The definitions: what counts

The reform tightens the core terms that decide when compensation is triggered. Connecting flights, where it has been disputed whether each leg is judged alone or the journey as a whole and the Court has repeatedly said the latter. And extraordinary circumstances, a term never exhaustively defined and stretched accordingly:

Connecting flights. Under 261/2004 it has been a point of dispute how a missed connection is assessed — each leg on its own, or the journey as a whole. The Court of Justice has, in several cases including Wegener (C-537/17), established that a single booking is seen as one journey and that it is the delay at the final destination that counts. The reform writes that principle into the text.

Extraordinary circumstances. The term has been in 261/2004 but never exhaustively defined, which has made it an elastic clause. The reform work touches exactly this. A concrete signal from SVT’s reporting in May 2026: higher fuel prices are not to count as force majeure. Put plainly — an airline should not be able to cancel a departure for pure cost reasons and then call it a circumstance outside its control.

A full breakdown of the definition changes is on the page about the new definitions in the 2026 rules.

The claim process: tightened requirements on airlines

The third part of the reform is about how a claim is handled. A recurring complaint under 261/2004 is that airlines drag things out, say no in the first reply and only pay under pressure. Forum threads are full of examples: claims that take months, airlines that announce they “can reduce the compensation by 50%”, standard emails that point to “an event outside our control” without explaining what happened.

The reform aims to tighten the requirements on how airlines handle claims — clearer response deadlines and stronger duties to deal with claims properly. The airline must answer a claim within 30 days. What it means in practice for how you file and pursue a claim is covered on the page about the new claim process.

Worth noting: whatever the reform adds, the official complaint route stays. If the airline says no, you can turn to ARN (Allmänna reklamationsnämnden — the Swedish National Board for Consumer Disputes), and Transportstyrelsen (the Swedish Transport Agency) is the supervisory authority. A complaint to ARN carries a non-refundable filing fee of SEK 150; ARN issues a recommendation. Read more in the new claim process for 2026.

The transition period in practice

The question asked most often about a rule change is simple: does it apply to my flight? The answer for the 2026 reform rests on a principle worth pausing on.

The reform of Regulation 261/2004 was adopted in July 2026. The new rules start to apply about a year after publication in the Official Journal, so not before 2027. Until the final, consolidated text sets an unambiguous date of application, we treat the exact entry into force as not established, and we update the page when it is settled.

What decides it, though, is not the date itself but the event it is tied to. It is the date of the flight disruption that governs which set of rules applies — not the date you discover you have a claim, and not the date you submit it. Three concrete cases make the principle clear:

  • A flight delayed last month is judged against EU 261/2004, even if you file the claim long after the reform has taken effect.
  • A flight disrupted after the reform rules have started to apply is judged against the new rules.
  • A ticket bought before the reform but for a trip after it takes effect follows the date of the trip, not the date of purchase.

For you as a passenger that means you do not have to worry about “missing” the reform or falling between two stools. The claim you have today is tied to the rules that applied when your flight was disrupted, and it gets neither better nor worse because the reform arrives.

Four questions the reform settles

Four short observations. The burden of proving force majeure already lies with the airline, so nothing changes there. The amounts stay at €250, €400 and €600 — the reform is about when and how, not how much. Pushing a claim through should get easier. And the delay threshold stays at three hours:

“Does the airline have to prove it was force majeure?” Yes — and that is already the case today. The burden of proof that a disruption was caused by an extraordinary circumstance lies with the airline, not with you. The reform does not change that principle, but by clarifying the term it makes it harder for an airline to stretch it. The signal that higher fuel prices are not to count as force majeure is one example: a pure cost reason should not be able to be dressed up as a circumstance outside an airline’s control.

“Do I get more money under the new rules?” No. The amounts of €250, €400 and €600 are the same. The reform is about when and how the compensation is triggered and paid — not how much. Anyone hoping for higher amounts will be disappointed; anyone who wants a clearer path to their money has something to gain.

“Does it get easier to push a claim through?” That is the intention. Clearer response deadlines and tighter requirements on how airlines handle claims should leave less room to delay and dismiss. But exactly how big the difference is comes down to the detail of the final text, and the ARN route, with its non-refundable filing fee of SEK 150, remains a safety net regardless.

“Is the delay threshold raised?” No. The text adopted in July 2026 keeps three hours, so we no longer hold back from a straight answer.

For a passenger, the whole picture amounts to something fairly reassuring: the 2026 reform is not an upheaval of your rights but a tightening of them. You do not have to relearn from scratch. What applies today — the 3-hour rule, the distance-based amounts, the duty of care, the ARN route, with its non-refundable filing fee of SEK 150 — applies in all essentials after the reform too, just written down more clearly.

The reform touches three areas — delay thresholds, definitions and the claim process — without lowering the amounts.

Illustration of a comparison table with three highlighted rows — the three areas of the reform: delay thresholds, definitions and the claim process

What it means for you

Four plain conclusions: a disruption happening now is judged in full under 261/2004, the amounts do not move, the rules get clearer rather than weaker as case-law principles migrate into the legal text, and the delay threshold stays at three hours:

  • If your flight is disrupted now, EU 261/2004 applies in full. The reform changes nothing for a claim about a disruption today.
  • The amounts are the same — €250/€400/€600. Nobody loses money to the reform.
  • The rules get clearer, not weaker. Principles that today exist only in court case law are moved into the text of the law.
  • The delay threshold stays. Three hours applies today and after the reform.

This is not legal advice

This page is based on published and institutional sources — expert review is still pending. The reform was adopted in July 2026 and starts to apply in 2027 at the earliest. For advice on your individual case, turn to ARN (the Swedish National Board for Consumer Disputes) or Transportstyrelsen (the Swedish Transport Agency), which is the supervisory authority for air passenger rights in Sweden.

We date and update this page when EUR-Lex, Transportstyrelsen or the Court of Justice of the EU brings out something new about the reform.

Frequently asked questions

Five questions close the 2026 page: when the new rules start to apply, whether the €250, €400 and €600 amounts change, which set of rules governs a disruption happening right now, whether the three-hour delay threshold is raised, and whether the 2026 rules reach rail travel as well.

When do the EU 261 new rules for 2026 start to apply?

The reform of Regulation 261/2004 was adopted in July 2026 and starts to apply about a year after publication in the Official Journal, so not before 2027. Until the final, consolidated text sets an unambiguous date of application, we treat the exact entry into force as not established. What governs your claim is the date of the flight disruption: a disruption today is judged against EU 261/2004.

Do the compensation amounts of €250, €400 and €600 change in the 2026 rules?

The amounts of €250, €400 and €600 (roughly SEK 2,800, 4,500 and 6,800) remain in the text adopted in July 2026. EUR is the legal unit and the krona figures are approximate. The reform does not change the size of the compensation — it changes the definitions and the process that decide when and how it is paid out. We go through how the terms change in 2026 in a section of its own.

Which set of rules applies if my flight is disrupted now?

EU 261/2004. For a flight delayed, cancelled or overbooked today, the current regulation applies, regardless of when you file the claim. The new rules govern only the disruptions that occur after they start to apply.

Is the delay threshold raised from three hours in the 2026 rules?

No. The Council of the EU position from June 2025 wanted to raise the threshold for shorter flights, but the text adopted in July 2026 keeps three hours. Later Swedish reporting (Transportföretagen, January 2026) states that three hours remains. Read more in the breakdown of the changed delay thresholds.

Do the EU 261 new rules for 2026 also apply to rail travel?

No. This page is about the reform of Regulation 261/2004. The EU has separate rules for rail passenger rights. If you search for “new passenger rights directive” you can land in the rail rules — that is a different set of rules with different amounts and conditions.

Sources and further reading

If you want to go deeper, read about the delay threshold after the reform, the new definitions and the new claim process. If you want to work out what you may be entitled to today, see what your route and delay produce.

No comments yet